CDN vs no CDN: what changes for a global audience

Without a CDN, every visitor pays origin RTT and origin capacity. With Cloud CDN, reusable bytes come from 210+ PoPs and the origin is shielded.

No CDN means the origin is the public internet path. That is simple until the audience is not in the same region, or until a campaign and a flood arrive on the same afternoon.

Latency

Without a CDN, TTFB tracks distance to origin. With Cloud CDN, hits average 30 ms worldwide on the network. HTML has to be cacheable for that to apply to documents, not only assets.

Capacity

Origin pipes and workers scale linearly with unique work. Repeat views should not. 200+ Tbps and Origin Shield exist so launches do not require a heroic origin.

Security

A public origin IP is a public target. A distribution with restricted pull is not.

When you might wait

A strictly local intranet app with no public audience may not need a CDN. A public marketing site in one city still benefits from TLS, DDoS absorption and cache, but the geography win is smaller.

Frequently Asked Questions

Usually no. Static sites are the easiest CDN origin, and they still have users who are not next to the bucket.

Yes. Many teams cache JS/CSS/images first, then HTML. Do not stop at assets if TTFB is the complaint.

No. You still need an origin. The CDN is the public delivery path.

Put this on Cloud CDN.

Get started with our Management Console in less than 2 minutes, or connect with an expert to supercharge your business today.